Scroll To Top
Guest Voices

Op-ed: The Strange Case of Uncle Poodle

Op-ed: The Strange Case of Uncle Poodle


The intersection between HIV and Here Comes Honey Boo Boo

In the course of a few short months, Lee Thompson (“Uncle Poodle” to reality TV watchers) has managed to personify a variety of hot-button issues among gay men today. He has come out as gay and HIV-positive. He has sent an ex-lover to jail and sent nude pictures via Grindr.

Or not. Depending on whom you believe. Let’s break down the strange case of Uncle Poodle.

In what we can all agree was a positive development, Thompson publicly came out as gay last year and evidently has the love and support of much of his family, the colorful clan of the TLC reality show Here Comes Honey Boo Boo. He instantly became an ally and friend of gays everywhere, talking about bullying, staying strong, and being a gay redneck in the Deep South. So far, so good.

Then, in a recent interview with the Atlanta gay magazine Fenuxe, Thompson made the announcement that he tested HIV-positive in May of 2012. What was startling, though, was his explanation of his infection. Thompson claimed not only that an ex-lover had knowingly infected him, but that the man is currently serving a five-year sentence for nondisclosure of his HIV status.

Almost immediately the details of the story were questioned (by everyone except Fenuxe magazine, which did not delve into the prosecution in the piece; the writer simply “applauded” Thompson’s bravery). Journalist Todd Heywood posed serious questions about the case, including the timeline between Thompson’s infection and the reported prosecution, which would have happened in mere months. Heywood also scoured court records from Georgia to Alabama and could find no evidence of any such case. Requests for more information from Thompson’s people have garnered no response. The defendant has never been identified.

Did Uncle Poodle lie about sending the ex-lover to jail? And why the hell would he do that?

It is my opinion that Thompson made up the prosecution story. And in doing so, he behaved in much the same way that most everyone does who tests HIV-positive these days. He looked for someone else to blame. He played the innocent victim. He released himself from personal responsibility. (Because everybody knows that when you test HIV-positive, you don’t call your doctor to start treatment. You call the police to press charges.)

Stigma is driving these actions, of course. People who become positive today are judged for being “bad,” for not following the rules, for failing the community, and for becoming one of the great unwashed. It makes no difference that they were simply caught being human, that they let down their guard for a moment or got drunk or didn’t care or stupidly fell in love. Their friends will furrow their brows. Their dating life will wither.

And so someone must pay for these indignities. That is one reason HIV criminalization laws have flourished—they appeal to our sense of vengeance. They are also vessels of homophobia, sexism, and racism, considering how badly the laws are applied and how often prosecutions run counter to public health or even common sense (some convictions have imposed jail time for decades even when condoms were used and no one was infected, and advocates believe people forgo HIV testing for fear of being prosecuted). Conservative lawmakers and prosecutors—who don’t believe people with HIV should be having sex at all—are more than willing to exploit our feelings of revenge when testing positive and lock up some diseased fags.

I empathize with those who test positive today. They suddenly find themselves on my side of the viral divide, but their hearts and minds aren’t here yet. Perhaps they have unresolved issues about their becoming infected, and I can understand if they have an impulse to lash out. And I believe that Lee Thompson did exactly that when he reported sending the man who infected him to jail. The man who no one can identify. The case that no one can locate.

Things have just gotten a little more complicated for our Uncle Poodle. Now someone who claims to have communicated with Thompson on Grindr is trying to sell naked photos that Thompson supposedly sent him (isn’t humanity grand?). Thompson being linked to Grindr—the app about which controversy recently arose when a survey indicated half of its users were engaging in bareback sex—presents a delicate situation indeed.

People living with HIV have every right to “full and satisfying sexual and emotional lives,” as the Denver Principles stated 30 years ago. [Editor’s note: The Denver Principles was a statement from an advisory committee of people with AIDS written in 1983. It’s seen as the start of the HIV/AIDS self-empowerment movement.] There is no evidence or details about Thompson’s sexual life or choices, so let’s simply hope he is conducting himself as someone with intimate knowledge of HIV nondisclosure laws, considering his contention that he sent someone to jail for withholding his status. The sword cuts both ways, and I worry for him. Lee Thompson certainly has faced his share of scrutiny, living as an HIV-positive gay man in the rural South, much less someone connected to a wildly popular reality series.

But he should consider his moves, both public and private, very, very carefully. Because Americans don’t simply like to tear down celebrities or save our judgment and revenge for those with the thickest skin. As we prove time and again, we can do it to the very best of friends.

MARK S. KING is the blogger at, where this article originally appeared.

Advocate Channel - The Pride StoreOut / Advocate Magazine - Fellow Travelers & Jamie Lee Curtis

From our Sponsors

Most Popular

Latest Stories

Mark S. King