September 14 2010 6:08 PM EST
Treatment GuideJust DiagnosedSex & DatingAfrican AmericanStigmaAsk the HIV DocPrEP En EspañolNewsVoicesPrint IssueVideoOut 100
CONTACTCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2026 Pride Publishing Inc.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
During trials of preventive HIV vaccines, trial participants may develop HIV-related antibody responses that could lead to a positive HIV test by routine antibody detection methods (called vaccine-induced seropositivity/reactivity), and the potential for false-positive test results and an incorrect HIV diagnosis, according to a study in the July 21 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, a theme issue on HIV.
Lindsey R. Baden, MD, of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, presented the findings of the study at a JAMA media briefing at the International AIDS conference in Vienna.
"With an estimated 7,500 new human immunodeficiency virus infections occurring each day worldwide, there is an urgent need to develop an effective prophylactic HIV vaccine. Over the past 20 years many potential vaccine candidates have been developed and assessed in human clinical trials in more than 30,000 participants."
The researchers add that induction of protective anti-HIV immune responses is the goal of an HIV vaccine. However, this may cause a reactive result in routine HIV testing in the absence of HIV infection, and has the potential of confounding factors that can improperly skew outcomes interpretation of HIV tests because of the antibody induced by vaccination. "Participants in early phase clinical trials, who are typically at low risk of HIV infection," the continue, "may encounter difficulties with obtaining medical or disability/life insurance, donating blood or organs, employment, and immigration owing to a false-positive HIV test result."
Baden and colleagues assessed the occurrence of vaccine-induced seropositivity, or VISP, associated with different vaccine delivery systems and HIV inserts studied by the HIV Vaccine Trials Network. Three common U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved enzyme immunoassay HIV antibody kits were used to determine VISP, and a routine diagnostic HIV algorithm was used to evaluate VISP frequency in healthy, HIV-seronegative adults who completed phase I and phase IIa vaccine trials conducted from 2000 to 2010 in the United States, South America, Thailand, and Africa. The majority of participants (82%) in the analysis were from the United States.
VISP occurred in 908 of 2,176 participants (41.7%). Rates of VISP varied greatly by type of HIV vaccine administered. For poxvirus products given alone or as a boost to a DNA or poxvirus prime, 53.4% (295 of 552) of recipients had VISP; 86.7% (399 of 460) of adenovirus 5 product recipients developed VISP, as did 35 of 555 (6.3%) of DNA-alone product recipients.
Overall, the proportion of VISP among the various HIV testing kits tested ranged from about 41% to 9%. The researchers also found that among the 901 participants with VISP and a Western blot result (a technique in molecular biology, used to separate and identify proteins), 92 (10.2%) had a positive result, 592 (65.7%) tested indeterminate, and 217 (24.1%) tested negative; however, the distribution of results varied by product.
"These data demonstrate that VISP is a common but highly variable outcome of trials of preventive HIV vaccines," the authors write. "Because participants with VISP may subsequently become infected with HIV, it is imperative that appropriate follow-up testing be conducted, including HIV RNA testing, to minimize potential misinterpretation of HIV test results."
"Testing for VISP at the end of the study and providing participants with their VISP status is critically important to prevent social harms, incorrect HIV diagnosis, and inaccurate reporting to health agencies. A misinterpretation of VISP can be minimized by clinicians obtaining a complete patient history (e.g., participation in an HIV vaccine trial) and interpretation of the Western blot and HIV RNA."
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
“So much life to live”: Eric Nieves on thriving with HIV
September 03 2025 11:37 AM
It’s National PrEP Day! Learn the latest about HIV prevention
October 10 2025 9:00 AM
Amazing People of 2025: Javier Muñoz
October 17 2025 7:35 PM
“I am the steward of my ship”: John Gibson rewrites his HIV narrative
September 16 2025 2:56 PM
Plus: Featured Video
Latest Stories
HIV-positive men stage 'Kiss-In' protest at U.S.-Mexico border
December 01 2025 12:56 PM
What the AIDS crisis stole from Black gay men
December 01 2025 6:00 AM
The Talk: Owning your voice
August 25 2025 8:16 PM
The lab coat just got queer
August 21 2025 10:00 AM
Messenger RNA could be the key to an HIV vaccine — but government cuts pose a threat
August 20 2025 8:02 AM
The Talk: Beyond the exam room
August 13 2025 3:15 PM
The Talk: Navigating your treatment
August 01 2025 6:02 PM
The Talk: Starting the conversation
July 25 2025 4:47 PM
Thanks to U=U, HIV-positive people can live long, happy, healthy lives
July 25 2025 2:37 PM
How the Black AIDS Institute continues to fill in the gaps
July 25 2025 1:06 PM
“I felt like a butterfly”: Niko Flowers on reclaiming life with HIV
July 23 2025 12:22 PM
Dancer. Healer. Survivor. DéShaun Armbrister is all of the above
July 02 2025 8:23 PM
BREAKING: Supreme Court rules to save free access to preventive care, including PrEP
June 27 2025 10:32 AM
1985: the year the AIDS crisis finally broke through the silence
June 26 2025 11:24 AM
VIDEO: A man living with HIV discusses his journey to fatherhood
June 10 2025 4:58 PM
Trump admin guts $258 million in funding for HIV vaccine research
June 03 2025 3:47 PM

































































