September 22 2010 8:46 AM EST
Treatment GuideJust DiagnosedSex & DatingAfrican AmericanStigmaAsk the HIV DocPrEP En EspañolNewsVoicesPrint IssueVideoOut 100
CONTACTCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2026 Pride Publishing Inc.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Food manufacturers advertise a variety of products on grocery store shelves by using nutrient claims on the front of packaging. A study in the September/October issue of the Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior evaluates how consumers are interpreting certain carbohydrate-related content claims and the effects of claims on consumer perceptions of food products. Findings from this study reveal that consumers misinterpret low-carbohydrate claims to have health benefits and weight loss qualities beyond their nutrition facts.
In the early 2000s low-carbohydrate claims gained huge popularity in response to such books as Dr. Atkins's New Diet Revolution and The South Beach Diet. In a study published in "AC Nielsen Consumer Insights," it was noted that there was a 516% sales increase in low-carbohydrate food products from 2001 to 2005, showing that front-of-package claims can play a large part in consumer decisions.
Existing research suggests that consumers are less likely to turn to the back of a package to look at the nutrition facts panel when there is a claim on the front of the package. In this new study researchers at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition sought to determine whether low-carbohydrate claims might lead consumers to perceive products to have benefits that are not necessarily related to being low in carbohydrates. Using an online questionnaire, 4,320 consumer panelists rated products for their perceived healthfulness, helpfulness for weight management, and caloric content based on front-of-package-only conditions (nutrition claims versus no nutrition claims) and availability of nutrition facts panels.
This study documents that in the absence of nutrition facts panels, "low-carbohydrate claims led to more favorable perceptions about products' helpfulness for weight management, healthfulness, and caloric content. Because an individual packaged food product's usefulness for weight management as part of an overall diet, its healthfulness, and total calorie content are not dependent solely on the amount of total carbohydrate it contains, the study demonstrated that consumers could misattribute benefits to products that claim to be low in carbohydrate."
However, the researchers found that when the nutrition facts panels are available "participants' perceptions became more consistent with the nutrition profile of the products.... By showing the claims and the [nutrition facts] side-by-side, both pieces of information were equally accessible to participants as they answered the study questions. The presence of the [nutrition facts], however, allowed participants to use this more diagnostic information to judge the product."
One limitation mentioned in this study by Judith Labiner-Wolfe, a former consumer science specialist at the FDA (now an evaluation specialist at the Department of Health and Human Services' Office on Women's Health) and colleagues is that "the online venue for viewing the stimuli and answering the study questions may have fewer distractions than situations in which consumers make real product judgments, such as in a busy grocery store. Therefore, this study may overestimate the effect of the nutrition facts panel. Findings from this research are consistent with previous experimental studies that found participants misattribute health benefits to products with claims and that nutrition information has an independent effect on perceptions."
The authors state that "although exposure to the nutrition facts has the potential for mitigating inappropriate benefits attributed to products claiming to be low carbohydrate, previous consumer research suggests that when a food product carries a front-of-package claim, consumers are less likely to turn the package over to look at the nutrition facts panel."
Within the article the researchers emphasize the important role nutrition educators have in helping consumers better understand the limited meaning of front-of-package claims and to further emphasize the importance of using the nutrition facts panel when making food choices.
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Amazing People of 2025: Javier Muñoz
October 17 2025 7:35 PM
It’s National PrEP Day! Learn the latest about HIV prevention
October 10 2025 9:00 AM
“I am the steward of my ship”: John Gibson rewrites his HIV narrative
September 16 2025 2:56 PM
Plus: Featured Video
Latest Stories
HIV-positive men stage 'Kiss-In' protest at U.S.-Mexico border
December 01 2025 12:56 PM
What the AIDS crisis stole from Black gay men
December 01 2025 6:00 AM
“So much life to live”: Eric Nieves on thriving with HIV
September 03 2025 11:37 AM
The Talk: Owning your voice
August 25 2025 8:16 PM
The lab coat just got queer
August 21 2025 10:00 AM
Messenger RNA could be the key to an HIV vaccine — but government cuts pose a threat
August 20 2025 8:02 AM
The Talk: Beyond the exam room
August 13 2025 3:15 PM
The Talk: Navigating your treatment
August 01 2025 6:02 PM
The Talk: Starting the conversation
July 25 2025 4:47 PM
Thanks to U=U, HIV-positive people can live long, happy, healthy lives
July 25 2025 2:37 PM
How the Black AIDS Institute continues to fill in the gaps
July 25 2025 1:06 PM
“I felt like a butterfly”: Niko Flowers on reclaiming life with HIV
July 23 2025 12:22 PM
Dancer. Healer. Survivor. DéShaun Armbrister is all of the above
July 02 2025 8:23 PM
BREAKING: Supreme Court rules to save free access to preventive care, including PrEP
June 27 2025 10:32 AM
1985: the year the AIDS crisis finally broke through the silence
June 26 2025 11:24 AM
VIDEO: A man living with HIV discusses his journey to fatherhood
June 10 2025 4:58 PM
Trump admin guts $258 million in funding for HIV vaccine research
June 03 2025 3:47 PM
































































